Bibilography of Constructivism References


Mary K. Rodwell, Ph.D.

Associate Professor, School of Social Work

Virginia Commonwealth University

Spring, 1996


Berreth D. (1986). Experiences of naturalistic inquirers during inquirery. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

Berkenkotter, C. (1993). A 'rhetoric for naturalistic inquiry" and the question of genre. Research in the Teaching of Enjzlish, vol. 27 (3), 293-304.

Chambers, D.E., Wedel, K.R., & Rodwell, M.K. (1992). Qualitative research methods and the constructivist paradigm in the evaluation of social programs and policies. In D.E. Chambers, et.al. Evaluating social programs. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 288-332.

Crowley, S., & Rodwell, M.K. (1994). A constructivist approach to public policy analysis. Paper presented at the Ethnographic Research and Urban Policy Problems Conference, Howard University, Washington, D.C.

Denzin, N.K. (1971). The logic of naturalistic inquiry. Social Forces, vol. 51, 166- 1 182.

Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.).(1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Franklin, C. (1995). Expanding the vision of the social constructionist debates: Creating relevance for practitioners. Families in Society (September), 395-406.

Green, J.C., Doughty, J., Marquart, J.M., Ray, M.L., Roberts, L. (1988). Qualitative evaluation audits in practice. Evaluation Review, Vol. 12 (40, 352-375.

Guba, E.G. (Ed.) (1990). The Paradigm dialo@. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Guba, E.G. (1987). Naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 34, 23-43.

Guba, E.G. (1987). What have we learned about naturalistic evaluation? Evaluation Practice, vol. 8 (1), 23-42.

Guba, E.G. (I 98 1). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, vol. 29, 75-92.

Guba, E.G. (1979). "The new rhetoric" of Egon Guba as compared to that of 10 years ago. Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 5, 139-140.

Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1988). The countenances of fourth generation evaluation: Description, judgment, and negotiation. Evaluation Studies Review Annual, No. 11, 70-78.

Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1983). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communications and Technolo@y Journal, vol. 30 (4).

Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1982). The place of values in needs assessment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 4 (3), 311-320.

Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (n.d.) The countenances of fourth-generation evaluation: Description, judgment, and negotiation. Evaluation Studies Review Annual, 70-88.

Halpern, E. (1983). Auditing naturalistic inquiries: The development and application of a model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

Kuhlthau, C.C. (1993). A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. The Journal of Documentation, vol. 49(4), 339-355.

Lincoln, Y.S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting, American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 18-22, 1995.

Lincoln, Y.S. (1992). Sympathetic connections between qualitative methods and health research. Qualitative Health Research, vol. 2 (4), 375-391.

Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Qualitative research: A response to Atkinson, Delamont, and Hammersley. Review of Educational Research, vol. 59(2), 237-239.

Lincoln, Y.S. (Ed.) (1985). Or2anizational theory and inguily: The paradiem revolution. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1990). Judging the quality of case study reports. Oualitative Studies in Education, vol. 3 (1), 53-59.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1989). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. Review of Higher Education, vol. 12 (3), 221-240.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In D.M. Fetterman (Ed.) Qualitative oproaches to evaluation in education. NY: Praeger, 89-115.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Proaram Evaluation, No. 30, 73-84. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inguily. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Rodwell, M.K. (1995). Using research for social justice: An example of constructivist research with street children in Brasil. Paper presented at the Southern Sociological Society Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.

Rodwell, M.K. (1994). Constructivist research: A qualitative approach. In P. Pecora et.al. Evaluating farriily preservation services. NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 191-214.

Rodwell, M.K. (1990). Naturalistic inquiry: The research link to social work practice. Paper presented at the 36 th Annual Progam Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Reno, Nevada.

Rodwell, M.K. (1990). Person/environment construct: Positivist vs. Naturalist, dilemma or opportunity for health social work research and practice? Social Science and Medicine, vol. 31 (1), 27-34.

Rodwell, M.K. (1987). Naturalistic inquiry: An alternative model for social work assessment. Social Service Review, vol. 61, 231-246.

Rodwell, M.K., & Woody, D. III (1994). Constructivist evaluation: The policy/practice context. In E. Sherman & W. Reid, Qualitative research in social work. NY: Columbia University Press, 315-327.

Schwandt, T. (1989). Recapturing moral discourse in evaluation. Educational Researcher, vol. 18, 11-16.

Schwandt, T., & Halpern, E. (1988). Linking auditing and metaevaluation: Enhancing quality in applied inguiey. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Skrtic, T. (1985). Doing naturalistic research into educational organizations. In Y.. Lincoln (Ed.) Organizational theory and inquiry: The paradigm revolution. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Smith, J. (I 984). The problem of criteria for judging interpretive inquiry. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol 6, 379-391.

Smith, M.R., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1984). Another kind of evaluation. Journal of Extension (November/December), 5-10.

Williams, D.D. (1986). When is naturalistic evaluation appropriate? New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 30, 85-101.

Zeller, N. (1987). A rhetoric for naturalistic inquiey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

* NOTE: Until about 1989, the constructivist research methodology was known as Naturalistic Inquiry, so both labels will appear in bibliographic citations.